ADDENDUM TO
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-02892
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
________________________________________________________________
_
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
He be awarded the Air Force Commendation Medal (AFCM).
________________________________________________________________
_
RESUME OF CASE:
On 16 Nov 11, the Board considered and denied the applicants
request to award him the AFCM. A complete copy of the Record of
Proceedings is attached at Exhibit E (with Exhibits A through
C).
By letters, dated 23 Sep 12 and 25 Sep 12, the applicant
requests reconsideration of his request, contending that the
newly discovered evidence that he provides in the form of a
Certificate of Appreciation, a media disc, a thumb drive, shows
an intent by others that he should have been awarded the AFCM.
In support of the appeal, the applicant submits copies of
personal statements, a copy of a video and thumb drive
containing information pertaining to his request, excerpts from
his master personnel records, letters of support, excerpts from
another officers master personnel records, an excerpt from the
United States Court of Claims, a copy of an education syllabus
and related documents, copies of photographs, copies of
newspaper clippings and a letter from the Command Surgeon, an
excerpt from the internet on the United States Constabulary, a
copy of events from his Keesler assignment, a copy of Merchant
Marine service, and a copy of a booklet on Turkey.
The applicants complete submission, with attachments, is at
Exhibit F.
________________________________________________________________
_
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. In earlier findings, the Board determined that there was
insufficient evidence to warrant any corrective action. After
thoroughly reviewing the additional documentation submitted in
support of his appeal and the evidence of record, we do not find
it sufficient to change the Boards earlier determination in
this case. Therefore, in view of the above, and in the absence
of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis upon which to
recommend favorable consideration of the applicants request.
________________________________________________________________
_
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered
with this application.
________________________________________________________________
_
The following members of the Board considered the applicants
request for reconsideration of AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2011-
02892 in Executive Session on 23 Jul 13, under the provisions of
AFI 36-2603:
The following additional documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit E. Record of Proceedings, dated 19 Jan 12, w/atchs.
Exhibit F. Letters, Applicant, dated 23 Sep 12 and 25 Sep
12, w/atchs.
Panel Chair
2AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02892
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-02892 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Air Force Commendation Medal (AFCM) and any other medals he may be entitled to. The AFCM criterion: The AFCM is awarded to members of the Armed Forces of the United States who, while serving in any capacity with the Air Force after...
AF | BCMR | CY1994 | BC-1994-02702
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is attached at Exhibit U. Nor does Sergeant K------s memo address the existence of any witness statements. Exhibit P. Letter, AFBCMR, dated 10 Sep 01.
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2011-00179-2
_________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. _________________________________________________________________ The...
AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2008-04290
We note that in 1998, the Secretary of the Air Force Personnel Council (now SAF/MRBP) made a determination the applicant had not served satisfactorily in the grade of technical sergeant and that he should not be advanced on the Retired List to the higher grade. SAF/MRBP has reviewed the applicant’s submission to the Board requesting that he be advanced on the Retired List to the grade of technical sergeant based on his service prior to his retirement, award of the AFCM, 3OLC at his...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-03248
DPPPWB advises that Air Force promotion policy dictates the closeout date of a decoration must be on or before the Promotion Eligibility Cutoff Date (PECD) and the signature date of the DÉCOR-6, Request for Decoration Printout (RDP), must be before the date of selections for a cycle in question. Should the decoration be upgraded and the applicant promoted to the grade of MSgt with a date of rank (DOR) of 1 Sep 89, DPPPWB recommends the Board adjust the applicant’s retirement date to 31 Aug...
AF | BCMR | CY1982 | BC 1982 02842 1
SECOND ADDENDUM TO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-1982-02842-2 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. For an accounting of the facts and circumstances surrounding the applicants original request and the rationale of the earlier decision by the Board, see the Record of Proceedings (ROP) at Exhibit F. On 20 Jul 83, the...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-1982-02842-1
SECOND ADDENDUM TO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-1982-02842-2 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. For an accounting of the facts and circumstances surrounding the applicants original request and the rationale of the earlier decision by the Board, see the Record of Proceedings (ROP) at Exhibit F. On 20 Jul 83, the...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-03270
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-03270 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Air Force Commendation Medal (AFCM) for time served in Thailand (16 May 1969 through 15 May 1970) and supplemental promotion consideration to Master Sergeant (MSgt), Senior Master Sergeant (SMSgt), and Chief Master...
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-03650
He was deployed to Iraq and attached to the 506 EOSS (a subordinate unit of the 332 AEW) for 129 days (19 May 06 to 24 Sep 06) . The complete DPSIDR evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: In his response dated 3 Dec 07, the applicant reiterates much of his earlier contentions; however, he also states SO G-3756, dated 26 Sep 07, is amended to include the 332 AEW, a subordinate unit, and the 506...
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-01646
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-01646 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: NOT INDICATED HEARING DESIRED: YES MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 25 NOV 2008 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The applicant requests the Air Force Commendation Medal (AFCM) covering the period 6 Apr 69 to 11 Feb 70, be upgraded to the Bronze Star Medal (BSM). On 24 Apr 01, the applicant...